« ESRD related language in HR 3590 the Senate health insurance reform bill | Main | Dialysis & CKD Blog Report 11/21 »

November 19, 2009

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

roberta mikles

Peter, thank you for posting this area of which demands attention and inclusion in all public comments.
Roberta Mikles, RN
Patient Advocate
www.patientsafetyday.com
www.qualitysafepatientcare.com

Lori S.

I agree completely with your view. This past week I submitted my comments to CMS on the proposed bundle and asked that they take a step back and reimburse all patients at the same rate, and also to reconsider adding any additional labs or meds. They have cost and reimbursement information to determine a fair rate on these items, but when they start adding Part D meds and additional labs the amounts they are considering for reimbursement are too low in my population. It is also difficult to explain to patients why one has a higher rate per treatment than another patient - sometimes by as much as $100, and why the rate changes monthly. We all have a variety of patients to treat, and the difference will come out in the wash. Another administrative cost I am not looking forward to is collecting copays, not just on treatments, but labs and meds. The bundling should simplify claims and the claims process, not make it more difficult.

Roberta Mikles

Is inclusion of Part D drugs not somewhat discriminating? It now seems with the inclusion of Part D drugs that those individuals with ESRD will have their Part D implemented different. This was NOT the intention when Part D was first initiated. Just seems so discriminatory
Roberta Mikles

roberta mikles

Clarification as I received a private email re post-----..

Medicare Part D is available to non-ESRD beneficiaries and ESRD beneficiaries now. However, in the proposed rule, with inclusion of Part D drugs, it seems that those with ESRD will NOT have the same Part D benefit as those non-ESRD beneficiaries, therefore, is this not somewhat discriminatory?
Roberta Mikles

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

2 sen logo

Search SEN


  • WWW
    WWW.BILLPECKHAM.COM

SEN in the Press

WKD March 8, 2018

  • WorldKidneyDay 2011

April 2018

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Blog powered by Typepad