DSEN twitter feed

    follow me on Twitter
    Blog powered by Typepad

    « Price Comparison Shopping Enters the Medical Marketplace | Main | Nocturnal Hemodialysis: Promising or Proven? »

    July 01, 2010


    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

    Peter Laird, MD

    Bill, that would be good news and a testimony to all those that spent hours diligently reading and reviewing the bundle proposal with the myriad of comments sent in to CMS.

    Denise Eilers

    Bill, I certainly hope you are right. Home dialysis offers patients the chance to be in total control of their health and treatments. It only makes sense to encourage patients to fit dialysis into their present lifestyle of work, social life, and family. Otherwise, we continue the mindset of viewing CKD5 patients as sick and disabled. I personally believe that attitude is unconscionable.

    roberta mikles

    Bill, I agree also and hope you are right. Our group's (Advocates4QualitySafePatient Care) comments, as many others, focused on these areas. We have always supported home dialysis. In fact, there are many units now who are really pushing for home dialysis ( after the bundle was made public) with posters on walls, home dialysis material throughout the units, etc. My question is why didn't providers do this prior to the bundle? Well, we know the reason, don't we? Was the patient not important enough to have home dialysis pushed as it is now? The important thing is that providers are now more focused on home. And, of course, meds should not be excluded - providers had a great influence here to exclude - - their influence has outweighed what patients wanted many times BUT this time patients did not want inclusion. We can continue to hope that the OMB will approve. Thank you for continuing to keep us all aware of that which is happening.
    Roberta Mikles RN
    Patient Safety Advocate
    San Diego, CA

    roberta mikles

    CORRECTION ---And, of course, meds should not be INCLUDED..

    wow, sorry for that.


    Can someone please help an uninformed, but interested, outsider on the oral meds question? Is it a good or bad thing that DaVita and Fresenius have their own pharmacy beenefits/specialty mail-order pharmacies? Thanks.

    Bill Peckham

    Pat in general I think it could be to the patients benefit for providers large and small to be in the loop as far oral medications. Like anything whether it is good or bad depends on the details - things like quality measures, payment amounts.

    I hope that the PPS required under MIPPA will not include oral drugs but that drugs will be included and fairly reimbursed, once the GAO completes their report; at which time CMS will have implemented the appropriate quality standards and reporting.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


    Post a comment

    Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

    Your Information

    (Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


    Fix Dialysis


      DSEN in the Press

      "... not evil ...""
      Kent Thiry, 5280 Magazine

    Search DSEN

    • WWW

    Rate DSEN

    December 2017

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
              1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30