DSEN twitter feed

    follow me on Twitter
    Blog powered by Typepad

    « Dialysis is like running a river - it's best to have your own momentum | Main | Could three hours of hemodialysis three days a week work? »

    November 10, 2017


    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

    Istenio Pascoal, MD

    Dear Bill,

    I admit that I am a little disappointed with your disappointment. For so many years you had been engaged in encouraging patients, payors and providers to embrace frequent hemodialysis concept and experience. My CBN&D colleagues and some of our patients have closely followed your blog's arguments while we hardly set up an in-center short daily hemodialysis (SDHD) program in the last decade.

    First, we reported data at the WCN-2009 (Milan), showing better outcomes in Incident SDHD patients as compared with Converted SDHD patients - those who had previously been on conventional thrice-weekly schedule:

    One year later, at the ERA-EDTA (Munich), studying only Incidents SDHD patients, several clinical, biochemical and social aspects were analyzed and have confirmed a better profile:

    At the ADC-2013 (Seattle), we presented outcomes from our first 100 patients and we announced, based on those supeior results, that SDHD had become an standard of practice in our unit:

    Further we verified that, in contrast with data on conventional 3 tx/week HD, our SDHD transplantation rate was higher than our mortality rate. So, based on that, at the ADC-2015 (New Orleans) we proposed an novel index for better evaluating dialysis quality:

    At the Kidney Week-2016 (Chicago) we showed how we have overcome the transportation barriers to sustain our long-term in-center SDHD program:

    And now, at the Kidney Week-2017 (New Orleans) we have discussed the positive impacts of 7 days a week dialysis service on our daily program:

    It has been a long journey with no way to come back. Hopefully you can joining us... again.

    Adolfo Simon

    Dear Mister Peckham
    Reading your post, I wondered how the relay would be done among the patients, for the dialysis scheme that you propose. A large proportion of the patients, perhaps 30% or more, would need to agree to this relay between the different days of the week, causing a significant change in the schedules of eventual extra dialytic activities of all patients, impairing one of the primary purposes of dialysis: patient’s ability for his socio-professional activities, without the benefit of the smaller post-dialytic recovery time, as with SDHD.
    Thinking on the economic side, the Clinic would have to open every Sunday, with labor costs higher than in other days of the week, to increase only about 4.6% in its monthly dialysis number: (0.3 x 15) + (0.7 x 13 ) = 13.6 HD pat / m,. Would it be economically viable?
    Best Regards.
    Adolfo Simon

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


    Post a comment

    Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

    Your Information

    (Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


    Fix Dialysis


      DSEN in the Press

      "... not evil ...""
      Kent Thiry, 5280 Magazine

    Search DSEN

    • WWW

    Rate DSEN

    December 2017

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
              1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30